/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14741431
>How does that explain how you determined the effect of extreme warming from periods that don't have extreme warming?
But we did, you ignoring them doesn't mean they don't exist.

>No, that's not how this works, you're the one respinsible for making sure your responses make sense.
I'm still waiting g on that irrefutable proof that humanity will be crippled or have a hard time in this new environment.

>Who are you quoting?
(You)

>Humans will not evolve in a few hundred years, no.
>Contrary to popular belief, not only are humans still evolving, their evolution since the dawn of agriculture is faster than ever before.[1][2][3]
Y>ou do understand that adapting to come with bigger bodies took hundreds of thousands of years
For our ancestors thousand of years ago, not for us and many fuckload of species evolving still today. Again, don't be a retard and claim something that you don't even have any clue about.

>Where's your proof humans advanced due to climate change?
see above