[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.5716926 [View]
File: 17 KB, 220x282, 220px-Karl_Popper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5716926

>>5716922
>Please go to /x/.
Please read a book, you philistine.

>> No.5164198 [View]
File: 17 KB, 220x282, 220px-Karl_Popper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5164198

A question on superposition:

The first question I have is this: Can we truly say that a particle is in a "superposition" rather than a definite position at any time? Isn't the superposition the totality of probabilities that an observable will be in a given state? If so, then each particle is only ever in a definite state and our problem is epistemic, and superposition refers only to the probability of finding X to be in a specific state. We could then claim that the particle is in a definite state, and superposition represents only our lack of knowledge as to what that state is.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]