[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16023015 [View]
File: 140 KB, 1000x1091, IMG_0634.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16023015

Learning to program kind of cured mine. Also copious amount caffeine.

>> No.11546783 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, 1584975325547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11546783

>passes in real analysis with no effort while everyone was in panic
>got the best grade in Number Theory
>failed in linear algebra while everyone did well
Can someone explain me if I am retarded or not?

>> No.10863324 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, 1518361581481.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10863324

Can you program something to feel pain?

>> No.10372794 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, 1546457765850.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10372794

"Reality should be studied by physical scientists using the tools and methods of
the physical sciences, and there can be no better language for expressing their
findings than the language of physics. For after all, physics is the most
fundamental science, that to which all other sciences can supposedly be reduced."

But this gives rise to yet another problem: physics is not self-explanatory. If physics
is regarded as an expression of the structure of reality, then clearly it is real, and a
comprehensive theory of reality must explain its every part and aspect. But then in
order to qualify as a comprehensive theory of reality, physics must explain itself, its
correspondence to reality, and arguably the biological origins and mental activity of
physicists in whose minds it exists. In fact, physics as we know it can explain none of
these things, or even the natural law of which it supposedly consists. Such explanations
are prohibited by its methodology as encoded in the scientific method, according to
which it must constantly be tested by observation and experimentation.

>Technically, it is not permitted to depart from the world of the senses.

physics btfo

>> No.10372790 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, 1546457765850.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10372790

>But this gives rise to yet another problem: physics is not self-explanatory. If physics
is regarded as an expression of the structure of reality, then clearly it is real, and a
comprehensive theory of reality must explain its every part and aspect. But then in
order to qualify as a comprehensive theory of reality, physics must explain itself, its
correspondence to reality, and arguably the biological origins and mental activity of
physicists in whose minds it exists. In fact, physics as we know it can explain none of
these things, or even the natural law of which it supposedly consists. Such explanations
are prohibited by its methodology as encoded in the scientific method, according to
which it must constantly be tested by observation and experimentation.

>Technically, it is not permitted to depart from the world of the senses.

physics btfo

>> No.10308216 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, 12535676843.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308216

>>10307152
Keep searching.

>> No.10140782 [View]
File: 141 KB, 1000x1091, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10140782

>tfw never even got to see a vagina

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]