/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3998889

It's so ironic that this guy completely missed the point of OP post. There's really no better way he could have done it.

Now if we zoom out a little, and use surface temperatures instead ....

>>3998929

The great thing about being a climate change denier is that you can start off by politicizing climate change, then accuse the scientists of politicizing climate change! For some reason no one ever calls them out on it. It's a beautiful strategy.

>>1708581

>stagnant since then

Stagnant since the year 2000? You can't really extrapolate a global climate trend from only 10 years of data. There have been no decreasing 15-year temperature trends since the 1960s.

In any case, thanks to the record heat of 2010, the trend is still positive. Global warming is not "stagnant."