/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15286217
I would assume it does, but I can't come up with an argument for it right now.
>>15286216
>An object cannot be empirical, only a claim can be empirical.
Wut. (let's disregard that a claim could also be seen as an object too).
>>15286216
>The consequential part of immaterial objects is that they can only be described with non-empirical claims
How is "the brain received a signal" not an empirical claim by nature of the objects it concerns? Do you have any other example of a non-empirical signal to give?