/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4011689
>Show me a case of curing small pox that is not words.
you've got talent, but you lack subtelty

>>4007624
Finally, I was waiting for it. I think my work here is done now.

>>3997157
It's been a pleasure doing busyness with you

lets hope our future collaborations will be just as fruitful

>>3928947
And that my friends, is how its done.

>>3912522
my work here is done

>>3742993
>stupid
>saging
>cunt
>fucking
get a little more mad please

>>3277157
>implying spelling wasn't the problem

>>3032505
>implying you're not 12 years old
>inb4 another reply and another one

>>2947884
the first two times, or the first 4 times? Which one is it?

>>2826569
I'm curious regarding the position of The Church concerning this matter

>>2814741

>since every dose of radiation can be harmful
>no studies that prove any cause below 100-200mSv
>on the contrary:

"Although there is not yet solid epidemiological information, most local physicians in Ramsar report anecdotally that there is no increase in the incidence rates of cancer or leukemia in their area. There are no data to indicate a significant increase of cancer incidence in other high background radiation areas (HBRAs). Furthermore, several studies show a significant decrease of cancer death rates in areas with high backgrounds. It can be concluded that prolonged exposure to high levels of natural radiation possibly triggers processes such as the production of antioxidants and repair enzymes, which decreases the frequency of chromosome aberrations and the cancer incidence rate."

"Inhabitants of Ramsar, a city in northern Iran, are exposed to levels of natural radiation as high as 55–200 times higher than the average global dose rate. Furthermore, radon levels in some regions of Ramsar are up to 3700 Bq m−3. To assess the association between the radon concentration and frequency of lung cancer, lung cancer patients recorded over the past 2 years in eight districts of Ramsar with different levels of radon were studied. Data from the Ramsar Health Network show that both crude lung cancer rate and adjusted lung cancer rate in one district with the highest recorded levels of external radiation and radon concentration are lower than those of the other seven districts. It can be concluded that lung cancer rate may show a negative correlation with natural radon concentration."

>>2755672

Its ok EK - we'll go dancing soon ;) - maybe even get drunk and high too!

>>2737742

Babe when you coming over? We're supposed to go dancing this weekend, I'll even cook dinner before we go!

>>2725423

hey beautiful. you let our thread die yesterday!

>>2718189

Fascinating! What else do you do? Do you have any pets?

>>2620350
>implying I haven't trolled you at least 3 times

>>2580111

>>2552864

>>2535206

<span class="math">\underline{\bf ANY~/b/~TARD~LURKING~THIS~BOARD~AND ~POSTING~TRIANGLE~SHIT~WILL~BE~BANNED}[/spoiler]

>>2431039
EK, it's been fun, but I have to go. I've thoroughly enjoyed trolling you. I'm all full now. Thanks for confirming once again what a feeding cunt you are.

>>2417591
So easy

This is why alcohol should be illegal
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/298/5601/2209.abstract

>>2081354
oh really, I don't suppose you have a citation on that?