/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7465911
>and the FDA knows fucking nothing and they always tell you the opposite of the truth whenever possible and just want to sell you cinnamon toast crunch.
>and most vitamin and mineral fortification of food is worse then useless and does not properly absorb, if its even the same kind of fucking molecule that your body needs.
>most of the people who contributed to FDA guidelines were working for fucking kelloggs.


never go full retard

retards on the internet: science edition thread

>math related conversation on popular online news website
>"As we know, a negative and a negative equal a positive"
>jokingly suggest -i * -i
>guy writes "no, a negative and a negative always equal a positive, dumbass"
>punch it into your graphing calculator dude
>another guy joins in
>"yeah dumbass thinks i doesn't follow the normal rules of math"
>no seriously punch it into your calculator
>"oh I see, you meant (0-i)(0-i). technicality"
>no, that's the same thing that I said originally
>"no, there's no such thing as -i * -i, there's just (0-1)(0-1)"
>you are repeating what I wrote, just with unnecessary symbols
>"no there's a difference. and besides, i is just theoretical and branches off into so many directions"
>not theoretical. just a number. just not a real one.
>[proceed to expand (0-i)(0-i) right in front of him]
>"no you're wrong. we haven't proven i. it's just theoretical. mathematical science!"

please kill me

>>7314869
jesus christ I know this is a text-based board but did you really not pick up on the sarcasm?