/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11969388
Post the evidence for the White-Black IQ gap being entirely genetic in origin (Watson's claim). Less than 1% of experts in the field believe this.

>>11815483
That's not what the experts say, as per the Snyderman and Rothman survey taken in 1984.

To answer your extreme example with another, Einstean and Tesla wouldn't have been as intelligent if their nutrition had been stunted as children due to famines.

>>5769141
Claiming scientists are liberal in a society where disputing liberal ideology gets you "automatically blacklisted" (your words) is about as relevant as surveying scientists in the Soviet Union and concluding they all claim to be communists.

When given anonymity the overwhelming majority of scientists quietly disagree with liberal dogma.