/sci/ - Science & Math

EXPOSURE
EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE

>>3827303
OH I'M SORRY YOUR HIGHNESS, I WASN'T AWARE I WAS REQUIRED TO SPOONFEED YOU.

>>3735017
- BASE LOAD
- TRANSMISSION LOSSES OVER GREAT DISTANCES
- MASSIVE SOLAR AND WIND FARMS IN OCEAN ARE PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE
- AND ONCE AGAIN, BASE LOAD

I'm not pro-nuclear as such, but I intensely dislike the rebuttal of WE WILL POWER CIVILIZATION WITH SUNSHINE AND HAPPINESS while disregarding that we could've done that this entire time and the reason it hasn't been done is because it's 1) less profitable and 2) has big problems with it before it can become a viable source of energy capable of supplying 100% of our energy needs.