/sci/ - Science & Math

should've practiced the booster landing

>>15947449
that's arguably true for any "live" broadcast

I hope it's not on the 17th as I have workplace lil christmas party

>>15816469
>Considering China's poor nuclear technology, tofu dreg engineering and sub-par construction standards
loaded question, not answering that

>>15808601
Terrible formatting, not gonna read

any negative is impossible to prove

The methodology is probably flawed. First of all, this seems to be collected from Western and SPECIFICALLY English-speaking sources. Secondly, _reported_ UFO sightings are more common in those countries that have access to the Internet and that have organizations specifically collecting and cataloging these.

France is well known for having a huge catalog of UFO sightings and it is not represented here at all all, which makes me lean in the language-bias direction. Other than that, I'm doubtful that UFO sightings practically don't happen in uneducated areas. In fact, I'm more inclined to believe that they do even more so, when retarded tribals see a helicopter or a plane and consider it a UFO.

TLDR: report/cataloging rate and language selection biases. If you want to deboonk me, please provide the methodology of this "study"

>>15586464
>>15586468
they're literally on earth right now

some UAPs are extraterrestrial probes

>>15530333
>>15530500
Universe doesn't like one-offs, in fact they're basically nonexistent. Call it a fallacy, but that's why I believe there are aliens elsewhere. Probably few and far between.

>>15512437
and those are all multiplications of 6, which is a multiplication of 2

base binary is the the root of all

>The atheistic acceptance of an unknown trigger for the Big Bang can be seen as a form of faith
wrong

even if it wasn't, you're just playing around with words/semantics

>>15487246
all of those videos are AI-generated

>>15367744
Europe is not a country thoughever and therefor lacks any sense of real unity. I don't care if Frenchies or Germoids have a launch site/space program. ESA is not my agency.

>>15325512
>>15325525
i don't believe it

been lied to too many times

>If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet
stopped reading there

fundamental misunderstanding of nature and/or bad faith argument

>Mixed class: no real pattern at all.
this is the only real class, all the others are just looking for patterns in randomness

Hypochondria

case closed

>>15006062
nobody wants to fund ESA because nobody feels it's their program

NOT MY PROGRAM

>>14752239
Not my flag. Not my leaders. Not my space program. Not my union.

can you please read through the tens of thousands of comments and spoonfeed me the funniest ones as screenshots (TikTok video with added memes will also do)

I'm going to bed and I expect to get a good laugh when I wake up, so get to work