/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8332763
>Because it doesn't add anything to the conversation
What do you mean by that?
People on that sub like posting non-facts (like "ULA is older than spacex" or "China is a less reliable launch provider than spacex"
I'm simply correcting them.

>it's looking for a fight
How?

>especially in the context of a dramatic event
If anyone gets upset by a comment on the internet then they need to grow up

>The only place it can possibly lead to is a useless chain of hairsplitting about definitions and technicalities
This is only true because spacex "fans" cannot deal with facts (like the fact that falcon 9 is second only to antares for least reliable launch vehicle in the business today)

>trollish feel
What?
What are you even doing on this site m8?

I got banned for that comment because it called out these kids' precious meme company and they got butthurt about it

>>8332765
>Yeah, that is blatant shitflinging.
How? Calling out someone's BS is not shitflinging

>ULA was formed by a merger of two rocket programs that date back to the 60s
and 70% of spacex is made up of industry veterans who should know better than to let their rockets explode like that

>Second point: meaningless gibberish with a side of racism.
lol, what?
You don't take China seriously because all you know about them or their space program is what you read from trash writers like Eric Berger
or sites like Wired or Popular mechanics, and you're calling me "racist?"

top kek

Both of you should go back to your home site, as you are incapable of handling bantz