/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8421763

But what if they aren't? What if we're the mistake?

>>8151067

Because a good portion of the people here spew incorrect knowledge that would make the online compendium of knowledge amount to nothing more than another wikipedia.

>>6437966
>The propeller is providing the air movement to provide lift

>>5034494
Woops. I was referring to your OP image

What is 2 + 2?

I really don't know how to explain this anymore clearly than I have already done, through the above proof. However, because there's still seems to be some confusion, I'll try to clear things up.

<div class="math">-1\cdot -1=1</div>

Given, (please don't make me prove this...)

<div class="math">-1\cdot a=-a</div>

So,

<span class="math">0\cdot a=0[/spoiler]

Rewriting,

<div class="math">(1+-1)\cdot a=0</div>

Distributive property,

<div class="math">1\cdot a+-1\cdot a=0</div>

1 times any number is that number, right?

<div class="math">a+-1a=0</div>

As seen, the number that, when added to <span class="math">a[/spoiler] yields 0 is <span class="math">-a[/spoiler]

It follows that,

<div class="math">-1\cdot -1=-(-1)</div>
<div class="math">-1\cdot -1=1</div>

>terraforming a whole planet in 2 decades

If you use red lasers then it's dangerous, OP. Red lasers are very hot, like the sruface of the sun hot, but green lasers are cool and are at a much lower power.

>>3366425

Hey /sci/
Whats your opinion on the singularity?

>>2219778
Hey, you know what's funny? I watched some OpenCourseWare video lectures on Principles of Chemistry and they only covered a bit more than my General Chemistry did, and it was nothing that an ambitious student couldn't look into on their own.

>CC
Fuckin right. This picture, it's every idiot who pays Uni prices to do their gen eds.

>>2055559

>>1647528
Yes, it will eventually. Good idea.
Just... just promise me you won't help anyone develop mind control.