/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10145844
Globale warming is a different term which is a bit more specific and which is falsifiabe;
OP is talking about 'climate change' which is not the same thing.

>>10145850
Yeah, like I said in the last sentence CLIMATE CHANGES EVERY FUCKING DAY. There are no two exact days with the same climate. Do you know what Karl Popper you brainlet? Then you should know his distinction between science and pseudoscience.
My OP has the simple premise stating that according to Popper climate change is pseudoscientific bullshit, see the image. Every fucking low IQ brainlet working for magazines could find a change in climate and then write an article about it. Climate change can explain everything in its field, it's like those new age hippies explaining everything with vibrations, energy and '''quantum'''.
What set of observations over what period of time would be enough to refute the theory?
IT'S FUCKING PSEUDOSCIENCE YOU BRAINLET!