/sci/ - Science & Math

back to /pol/

here's a perfect example of the cancer.

he comes in and posts a ready-made meme of strawmen, ready to launch, to derail a thread and start an argument about the value of science itself
they come from stormfront and breitbart, ironically co-opting postmodernist talking points to shit up the board.

if only these piggots would consider "both sides" of the debate about the benefits of drinking bleach and give it a shot

>>12515157
t.

>>11211230

>>11161898
>refusing to provide any studies or data
no, i think that's you

itt:

>>9886974
Yes it does.
You are assuming IQ is unaffected by the environment around you.
To put it quite simply, if you don't have access the basic needs and services for your society to run (i.e. no one will allow you to purchase these goods and services), you are going to see (at least) a stagnant growth in such statistics. This is natural to what we see in segregation. The minority gets alienated, and isolated from the rest of society. Society breeds contempt for the minority, and the minority breeds contempt for themselves. The miniority society reaches a point of depression, of which spirals out of control.

IQ is very much a moving target, and it's relative to the period of time associated to it.
America is smarter than it was 50 years ago. Taking the same IQ test, now, that we took back in the past we will see a higher average than if we were to take the present test.
Secondly, as with any of these statistics, people cannot look at a single statistic and determine the net worth of individuals from said statistic. That's simple-minded and reductive.
Finally, interpreting this data is also commonly flawed. If I were to say all top football players are frenchmen, I cannot therefor claim that frenchmen have a natural affinity towards football. A implies B does not mean B implies A. This is a common problem in statistics, of which every first-year has to go through via what is called the false positive problem.

To put it short, /pol/ operates on poorly sourced infographics and hyperbolic memes. If you think that is a valid form of education, you need to go back to school.

>/pol/ thread

>>9594199
Little does /sci/ know that the social sciences draw heavily from STEM fields, as depicted by the Scale of Purity.

btw, just here to say that all Humanities majors are shit with the exception of Linguistics: my major.

>>9543533
>what is a meme

>>9517540
>>9517543
This, tbqh

At the very least you can tell your friends that you've slammed brewskies with Neil "The Grass" Tyson and two black men.

How do we take back race realism from /pol/? Surely we need a better representative then people who will dismiss the all scientific knowledge and other advancements of the west that doesn't fit their narrative as jewish and call you a ctr shill when you come up with an argument they can't oppose. So what do we do /sci/?