/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15805439
I think the hermetic alchemists had the best approach, everyone writes under an anonymous egrigore that personifies divine intellect- hermes thrice greatest/thoth/mercury. The ego is assuaded by identifying with the mimetic desire to contribute to the egrigore and see ones ideas float to the saliency of the hivemimd. If thats enough you can derive a username like hermais, or hermagoras to denote your affiliation with the egrigore. By doing this the field doesnt gett polluted by the brand builders coopting the craft for their personal self stultification, and no one has to sunken cost fallacy on bad ideas or withold data cause it would ruin a friends career.

With that being said, please vote imhotep as the sole S+ class scientist, he created math from the reed beds of the nile, everyone else are imitators

>>15749122
Yes, especially if economics and psychology are allowed here. It forms a liturgical tradition that is highly relevant todays zeitgeist, mainly information warfare

This is why 4chan and anonymous is relevent. In eerie parallels to the centuries of philosophers who concealed their identities to compile the hermetic corpus, anonymous unique eschews ego and monetary gain as the proginators or agitation towards the construction of text

As one banned or shadow banned on every corner of the net by those in the mimetic catastrophy that is ego and status competiton on dopamine hijacking algos, its as though the world screams for Galileo and others impassioned to speak indelendently of the modern inquisition

>>15011063
perhaps not that relevant, but what do you think informed the intellectual basis of the biblical texts?

surely not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMAtkjy_YK4&t=11820s