/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9006436
>The Millennium problems are a meme

>>8988687
>opinions?
it's blatantly obvious you don't know anything about most of the subjects in the picture

Does there exist an elliptic curve [math] E/\mathbb{Q}[r] [/math] such that specializing [math] r [/math] to a natural number gives [math] rank_\mathbb{Q}(E)=r [/math]?

>>8780431
what does the brainlet's ethics and morals have to do with the profitability of certain forms of research?

>>8762296
idk how competitive it is (i got in lol) but there's some great algebraists/topologists/geometers/number theorists here at least, i don't know much about the applied people

>>8752564
there's a difference between hyperbole and making blatantly incorrect blanket statements

this is why its ironic when you say you're against narrow-mindedness

the rest of your post is a bunch of rambling, with you hilariously still making the same mistake that you're criticizing

>>8745023
no they have the same 'cardinality', which is the second smallest infinity (the smallest infinity is the infinity of the natural numbers)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality

the map (2/pi)arctan(x) is a bijection from (0, infinity) to (0,1)

Well /sci/ i went full autistic and started studying integral calculus on my own; i can't do 3 things.

I managed to find alternate formulas of the revolution function surface C(x), being these two first formulas.