/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8589074
>ANYONE WHO RESPONDS TO MY BULLSHIT IS A SHILL

Still failing to address a single argument I have made, but no worries, it's easy to just ignore evidence and call others shills, takes ALL the effort away from actually having to form a coherent thought!

Another one of his sources debunked, do I need to continue?
there is no evidence that further cooling is likely in the immediate future

Look at this shit, # 22 of his links. Keep in mind, I'm only on the FIRST PAGE of THREE and I've already pointed out numerous errors that this guy apparently skimmed through.
https://ecommons.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/5865/Magill_Bonnie_L_1980_sec.pdf?sequence=1
Title:
>Temperature Variations in Southern Saskatchewan 1921-1970 Regional Identification of Trends
What does this have to do with Global Cooling? Read the image I posted. This paper doesn't even have the slightest thing to do with global climate, it is about regional climate and it talks NOTHING about global cooling.

It's also a scan of a fucking Graduate student's thesis, kek not even a link to if it was actually published to peer review or anything.

How can you take anything this guy posts seriously when he has already shown that he is willing to be deceptive to try and build his fake scientific consensus on global cooling? Read through his fucking sources. The most hilarious part is people like you claim to be "skeptics," yet you NEVER question your own bullshit sources.

Look at the images you're posting, it's almost like you have these prepared responses, almost like you're WOW, A SHILL!
>Lincoln Evening Journal
https://www.newspapers.com/title_1093/lincoln_evening_journal/
ANOTHER NEWSPAPER! WOW! MUCH EVIDENCE YOU HAVE THERE!
This surely looks like a scientific paper written by a practicing climatologist during the 1970s / 80s, correct? No, it's just another fucking opinion piece, probably citing other opinion pieces about global cooling at the time, like the Newsweek / Time articles.