/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10315453
There is not even one aspect of this pic's argument that is valid, but it's cool to have an opinion, so good on you.
By which measurable unit do "geographically separate populations" have an advantage over non? This assumes they've always been separate, revealing historical ignorance.
The thesis "All mixed populations of history eventually fell into chaos," while true, again assumes the existence of '100% genetically and culturally homogeneous populations' even being conceivable.

Race itself is a lie perpetuated by the Vatican.
"White races" are a relatively recent development in history, which is simply the result of inbreeding within a small gene pool leading to the deactivation of the gene which produces melanin.

http://realhistoryww.com/

>>10264217
Isn't stealing historically more a European trait? Not just in the last century.

As a person of altaic/anglo decent, I support this image macro as it is true.

>implying there are no "non colored people" alive that single handedly prove that "heritage intelligence" is one of the stupidest memes of all time?

>>9816979
Nice fictional history you got there.
Would be a shame if there was evidence to the contrary.
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/White_people.htm