/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12697411
These possibilities are not mutually exclusive. Most democrats are uninformed low IQ, partisan losers who worship celebrities, social media, journalists, and big tech. Most republicans are uninformed low IQ, partisan losers who worship the police, the military, and the Bible. Both democrats and republicans are uninformed retards, who are easily manipulated by politicians, corporations, lobbyists, marketing firms, and their respective political parties.

The problem with the world is not one party or one politician or one group of people. That's a simplistic way of looking at the world, and you're a retard for thinking that uneducated, working class conservatives are the primary problem with America/Europe today. If working class, white conservative were the source of all the worlds problems, then most of the non-western world would be doing great (because they don't have large populations of working class white conservatives), but they aren't. Every country in history has had socioeconomic problems, inequality, corruption, etc. These problems aren't the result of muh ebil blue collar racist conservatives. The problem is our political and economic system as a whole. The problem is corporations, the military, politicians, the mainstream media, etc., not a few conservative LARPers who are part of organizations Qanon and Proud Boys that didn't even exist until a few years ago.

sin(2theta) = 4.9 = ?

>>12508153
>>12509752
>>12507845
>You're still not using that word correctly though.
>What makes you think I'm insecure? You're not even using that word correctly. Maybe you mean 'frustrated' or 'offended' or something? If you're mad at someone for taking a different perspective from yourself (e.g. getting mad about a difference of opinions regarding Euler's identity), that's not "insecurity". Like I said it could be described as "frustration", "offense", or you could even argued that I'm emotionally unstable or prone to anger, but the word "insecure" doesn't really apply there, so your comment makes no sense.

This is bullshit. You are insecure . That world accurately describes you. You're a whiney loser who got pissed of because some random person on a message board doesn't like Euler's identity as much as you. You're self-obsessed with your own intellect and you are personally offended that someone on the internet doesn't share you tastes. You are a low IQ loser and you are completely enraged about reddit-tier topics for pseuds, namely Euler's identity. You also type like a literal autist and you clearly take yourself very seriously.

>>11280104
You are an embarrassment to every scientist and mathematician that has ever lived. Get off this board now you fucking brainlet

>>11231633
sorry anon but you are a fucking brainlet. my suggestion would be to rope asap

>>11083629
t. brainlet

So why haven't we found out how to make cold fusion yet?

How much of a mistake is it to attend a state school rather than a private school?

>>>/g/69212218
Anon trying to falsify science, disprove quantum and newton's physics and thinks that NASA are a bunch of retards, and satellites, rockets, probes are all "shoot and pray"
-/g/

>>69212218

-/g/