/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11009520
A number is an element of an ordered set and you have failed to give the ordering of 0 hat with respect to the rest of of R in your set ~R.

Furthermore, the final implication of your proof shows that your definitions lead to a contradiction and are, therefore, not good definitions useful for mathematical analysis.

>>11009568
I didn't cast dispersions on Riemann in any way. I praised him, and my point saying that he didn't define R wasn't posed to show that Riemann is an asshole, but rather that the people who get too worried about the specifics of whether a number is in R or not are assholes.

>>11009576
no, the hat I use is pic related hat. it's the one architects have been putting on their finest buildings for millennia

>>11009882
MathAnon's paper was completely fucked up. At the end, he concludes all this stuff is equal to zero. Then when you go back through the paper, pretty much everything he did was division by zero: a notoriously unallowed operation.

In any case, the 4D cube "tesseract" in OP pic has nothing to do with 4D spacetime because spacetime is Lorentzian but the tesseract is Euclidean. The 4D Lorentzian shape is a hypercone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercone