/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15443652
Denial of evolution is a fascist theory meant to justify Christianity and outaated religious dogma that is no longer relevant in the 21st century.
Creationism is not science or math. Go back to your containment board.

>>15389866
>retarded climate change denier makes worthless bait thread

Many such cases.
Go back to your containment board, incel.

>>15382159
>opinionated retard decides to share his opinion on a subject he doesn't even understand on a basic level

Many such cases. I hate to break to you, since I know incel often struggle with anything that challenges their narrow and simplistic worldview, but science isn't ending. Science will go on as long as there are people who value truth and progress more than tradition, ignorance, and superstition. Moreover, incels like you will always continue to hate science, and hate everything else you don't understand, and people who are actually smart will continue to ignore you guys, and will be better off for it.

Science may change, but science deniers always seem to stay the same.

>>15333612
>>15334429
>>15327192
>muh SJWs
>muh "shills"
>muh AI
>muh Trump

lmao this board has truly turned into pol 2.0.

Almost half of the posts on this board are either schizo Infowars-tier conspiracy theories and science denial, or thinly veiled white nationalist/neo-nazi race baiting about muh IQ and muh race realism.

Go back to whatever shithole alt-right corner of the internet you came from. Just go back to jerking off to My Little Pony in your mom's basement, or whatever it is that "based and redpilled" NatSoc incels like to do these days. You people are clearly too stupid to understand basic math or science, so you're insistence on constantly "debating" these issues in a simplistic and completely uninformed manner is a waste of both your time and everyone else. If you aren't actually interested in science and you hate scientists and the scientific community, then just find something else to talk about. Conversely, if you are actually interested in the science, and you're willing to question you own conspiracy theories and scientifically inaccurate views, then by all means do so, but in the case you need to engage with the actual research and be willing to trust scientists instead of just claiming that they're all part of some conspiracy to "take away our freedom".

>>15269951
>another anti-science thread on sci

It's always the most retarded most scientifically illiterate morons who are the most confident in making these sort of retarded critiques. You obviously don't understand science and don't have any expertise in the subject, so what makes you think you know better than actual scientists. Maybe you should focus on your own ignorance and stupidity instead of criticizing scientists and experts who have a lot more training and knowledge than some fear-mongering internet conspiracy theorist like yourself.

You're a retard and a loser and nobody wants you on this board.