/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4790567
Oh my, it appears you forgot to censor your information.
Tsk! Tsk!....these law students never get any brighter

Im in the college studying sociology, and i aint even mad
>mfw when not a single fuck was given today

>Man landing on the Moon? RIDICULOUS!
>A giant alien mothership mining for Moon-gold? FACT

Oh /x/, you're such a card.

Man landing on the Moon? RIDICULOUS!
A giant alien mothership mining for Moon-gold? FACT

Oh /x/, you're such a card.

>>1627808
Oh Canada!

>>1270332

Fuck you people saying it shouldn't be aborted. Haven't you guys ever studied overpopulation? Most of the shit going on in the world today (that isn't lolreligion based) ALL stems from overpopulation ... within a few decades there will NOT be enough arable land left on the FUCKING PLANET to grow enough food to feed a projected population of ~10 billion by the 2050s. That's not even taking into account how limited mineral resources are rapidly dwindling with only a few years to decades of mining left foreseeable for many currently indispensable materials. I'm pretty sure that we're going to start venturing into space not just because we "want to", but because there are fucking trillions of dollars worth of minerals waiting to be mined out of asteroids, minerals that we will desperately need.

Sure, the kid could maybe be an astrophysicist or cure cancer... but probably not, not with the way he'll likely be raised (by parents uncertain and unprepared to give him a top quality life)... more likely than not he'll be a pizza delivery boy, or in fact, very likely a gay buttsex solicitor. This I am sure of.

So yes, abort the kid, that's one less not-contributing-anything-useful-to-society-human pushing Earth over its carrying capacity.