[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4461301 [View]
File: 46 KB, 600x401, 1314978310167.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4461301

1. People are driven into science at childhood mostly by reading books, watching nature and history documentaries etc., and being curious about these subjects pushes them to investigate further on their own.
2. It is less socially acceptable to do so, in part because it is by nature a solitary occupation. As result, there's peer pressure to neglect these hobbies and to ridicule those who don't. Also, being a social reject to begin with, one is more likely to adopt solitary hobbies, among them the above.
3. In consequence the majority of those who end up showing curiosity of scientific fields even at an early age were social rejects as children, some of whom were so because of their looks, mannerism and/or social skills; this occupation also directly raises intelligence; and intelligence begets exposure to knowledge, therefor opinion, a moral compass and character; this is expressed later in adulthood in the known attractiveness-intelligence ratio.
4. Women, at least in the social aspect, experience far more pressure to be popular and part of an in-group, not to be solitary, and to achieve their goals through social interaction using emotional manipulation and looks. As a result the majority that does end up solitary, therefor more scientifically inclined, were completely unable to be accepted socially by their peers, to achieve male protection through looks and assuming childish or sexual roles, and so are even more likely than men to be unattractive.
5. Q.E.D: As result of 1-4, most women who show interest in science are not good looking, have little feminine definition and have little capacity for sexual play.

tl,dr: Women who like science do so because they're fugly, pretty women are dumb and have no personality.

>> No.4304339 [View]
File: 46 KB, 600x401, 1309756346731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4304339

/sci/, I'm refreshing my math skills a bit and am currently doing limits.

How would I go about solving (2t^3 + 3t^2)/(3t^4 - 2t^2) as t --> 0

The answer is already given, I just need something to get me on the right path. Thanks.

>> No.3321214 [View]
File: 46 KB, 600x401, 1295208807678.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3321214

we had a thread about colonizing new planet
since EK still keeps saying she's a woman we will use her as much as we can to expand our population

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]