/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10952091
>Not even the article in your image says that you fucking liar.
google the article and read it retard
>There is nothing that says a carbon tax has to be regressive. And you whine about a tax, something every government in the world does, as if it's the worst thing in the world without any analysis if the cost vs benefit. You're an alarmist.
i am an alarmist really? just google new carbon/meat taxes retard, they want to fuck the middle and poor classes in the ass very hard,
Yes, we need solutions idiot, and tax on meat is not a solution, you must find alternatives. Talking on the internet and upvoats on reddit/twitter etc will not save this World and neither choosing retards like Bernie for US president who would crash the US/World economy.

>We can start replacing fossil fuels right now if we disincentivize their use. The market is never going to magically do it on its own because there is no natural mechanism for such a large scale problem.
of course, and the planes, ships, trains etc will work on air right ? and there are more than 1 billion cars in the world, you can't replace them all with electric cars. you need at least 50 years, maybe more to replace all the cars in the world, and then you will consume more power from ??? coal like Germans?