/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8416581
Checking them out is a must!

>>8416597
Look at some simple proofs and try to extract the proof structure out of them. In simplicity, you assume something and either
>deduce it directly from the assumption
>use induction
>derive a contradiction from the assumption that the claim is false (if not constructivist)
I never read any books on how to prove stuff and, honestly saying, have this gut feeling they are pretty much redundant.