/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6217093

Still can't figure it out. With what I have in that s/s it has no effect on the trend/data in the table.

>>6217072

I feel like you have the greatest potential thus far to be able to help me.

Based on my image >>6217093

Do you have any idea what I would actually plug into the stock?

>>6080905
Actually laughed a bit.

This is definitely the scientific section of 4chan.

why does crushed ice melt faster than cubed ice?

I thought it had to do with surface area exposed to heat, but with cubes you're still exposing a large area to heat.

Yes, ln(p) would be the y-axis. And don't worry, I'm a chemical engineer and still have to look this up sometimes lol

Hey /sci/, can you help me with something?

Explain all this Hawking Radiation shit to me. Some questions firstly:

>So we "know" that these dual particles come into existence from nothing, and then destroy each other extremely fast. So fast, that they aren't even considered reality. How did we test this? How did we find out these existed and are coming from essentially nothing?

>What the fuck is Hawking Radiation? I keep hearing the term thrown around in relation to that subject. Are the particles that are created and destroyed almost instantly "Hawking Radiation" or what?

blah blah google or whatever, don't want to sift through shitty Wikipedia articles. Rather would hear it in laymans terms. Also, Quantum Physics general since we're at it.

Pic unrelated.

some chick on umbl is trying to prove creationism.

girlwithathought.t-----r.com/post/1426717200/re-rzinz-reblog-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics