/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16117119

>>16117974
>Anyone who doesn't toe the line is canceled via abuse of the peer review system, thats the peer review system's sole purpose

>>16106414

>>16098961
soiyence uses the peer review system to shut dissidents up, thats why the peer review system was invented

>>16041949

>7. nobody cares about your small amount of honest studies calling into question the fraudulent theoretical framework

They care, thats why the go to the trouble to abuse the peer review system to shut down anyone who doesn't go along with the program

>>15950138
Because leftists are so tolerant and open minded that they abuse the peer review system to cancel anyone who expresses beliefs that differ from their own

>>15867401
they're lying about that, they'd lose their jobs and salaries if they didn't

>>15863387
>It's a conspiracy!!!!
>Dr David Legates and his nefarious sponsors are out to get me
What about all the people who are paid to shill the global warming meme?

"conspiracy theorist" is a dumb insult, science is full of people who collaborate, anyone who doesn't notice that is extremely low iq

>>15758878

>>15520225
this

>>15387909
they're just political activists posing as scientists, just like all the other scientists. honest people don't go into that line of work anymore, they get shut out by the political activists via the peer review process

>>15338675
it would be nice if we lived in a perfect world and everyone was honest, but that is not the case and things only seem to be getting worse.
i think a lot of the problem is people get into science for all the wrong reasons, if it wasn't shilled as a prestigious, noble pursuit then fewer people would pursue it as a status symbol. science would be better off if the job held the same status as toilet cleaner

>>15277747
abuse of the peer review system to "cancel" anyone who voices disagreement with the false narrative. nobody in climate science is willing to throw away their prestigious academic careers in the name of honesty, none of them have to possibility of earning more than minimum wage if they're forced to work outside of their academic field.

>>15211583

>>15190063
every time jannie deletes a thread on this topic, it only proves further that censorship is the only way to prevent scientists from pointing out that global warming is a false narrative which contrived with hidden motives in mind.

>>15185353
>but what about the scientists saying it
the ones who refuse to say it lose their jobs