/sci/ - Science & Math

LOG (from the log meme, HTML only)
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=53054654562431378856

>>9575935
>the best book

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>>9488862
>>9488868
I wrote a lot more about it in my blog if you go back to the older posts
http://2occatl.net/splittingofthetimes.html

>>9482990
10 months is new relative to the history of mathematics.

Early in my research program, I have been publishing since 2009, I did seek peer-review All the journals I asked to give it to me refused to do so. They just said "no" and I never received peer review from any of them. Since they fucked me over so hard, I am refusing to work with them.

I am even banned by arXiv. Have a look at this document (PDF arXiv submission stamp before rejection) and it should be obvious that my ban has nothing to with a lack of merit and/or original contributions to physics.
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

I am refusing to seek "peer-review" at least until the agencies that administer peer-review acknowledge that I am better at their jobs than they are, and that they were both wrong and stupid to reject my manuscripts so many times. The Riemann paper s mostly mathematical but in my physics research I have submitted manuscripts very many times to very many journals of the APS, AIP, and IOP. They want me to submit to their desires, but I want them to submit to my desires. My desire is for them admit in public how stupidly they have received my results. (My desire is also to pour out wrath on their heads for certain things that have transpired while they conspired to deprive me of my due accolades.)

They can stall the forward progress of scientific discovery for a while but the longer they do so the worse they will be remembered in the history of science and mathematics. I want to make them look as bad as possible, hopefully so bad that their appearance in history becomes an accurate reflection of their complete lack of virtue and their disgusting, loathsome disregard for what is ordinarily considered ethical behavior in science and scientific publishing.


>>9483014
I am a he. In fact, I am "him."

no takers?
just one tooker I guess

>>9302710
99% of my code at LexisNexis was written by Tim Newport, not Tim Jeffries. The Jim at Lexis could have been Comey, but the Jim that Tim and I sat next to at Exide was a different Jim: James.

I made a joke to Jim "Father Berlin" Farbolin about the FBI seeing who was fucking up my Elavon data at LexisNexis and Jim was like, "Oh see! He is paying attention." I'm always payong attention. I just don't know what to make of it most of the time, and I ignore stuff like that since I have discovered the ultimate truth of the universe. I know it well and I focus on it a lot.

>>9011942
>is he really as brilliant as they say he is
if being prolific and being brilliant are the same thing then yes. otherwise maybe not. Has ever made an error that he refused to correct even after it was obvious he had erred? If so, definitely not.

>>9000662
what would you call the search for new analytical frameworks to distinguish it from the application of the logical processes of existing analytical frameworks?

here is the current draft of my humble book
>https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMekw2NnlDSmRfT00