/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11067036
>So at least 8 pairs of eyes.
you are either confusing things or are stating some source other than the man himself in the podcast, in which case please do link it.

nobody actually saw the Tic-Tac with their own eyes, just one jet with one FLIR computer.

what the Cmdr. saw with his own eyes was some thing under the water surface which he never saw rise or dip below the waves, for all we know it could be the same or an entirely different object related or unrelated to the flying one.

>on radar for it being something just next-generation tech.

we got 2 radars in this incident, one on the Hornet that took the FLIR footage and one on the ship that was seeing the object for 2 weeks.

the Hornet radar was either unable to see it on the radar band, or actively jammed, which the Cmdr. did not say himself, Beardy McGravity claimed that, so we can't say for sure.

the ship radar, by the own words of the Cmdr., was at such great distance that it was unable to distinguish the Hornet from the object, so any movements, sudden popping in and out of radar view cannot be proof of movement even if you could assume that.

it could have been several drones that are capable of being entirely invisible to the radars at the distances and powers involved using what is called Fresnel lenses to decrease and increase their RCS to test detection rates.

again, nothing is certain here other than something(s) was in the sky in those 2 weeks, everything beyond that is speculation and sensationalism.