/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8901269
Social construct is not an argument. It is a word. Everything is a construct because you cant objectively experience out of our own reality in mind but just the phenomena we construct and share in language. This is a debate for philosophy of science and methodology which creates the elementary base positions most scientists stand on. Positivists will say we can semiobjectively see the reality out there. Social constructionists will say we are more likely just creating this world in our heads and cant be sure to see it because it is literally created in our minds. It is very similar position they take but the implications to methodology and research are huge.

Construct is just academic word. It is not an argument. You are making assumptions all over. Are you one of those critical theorists, feminists or a troll? Im sure you are funny but it is not. This thread is annoying, non productive and you just wasted your potential writing it. You visit this shithole that means there is something you want from it otherwise you would troll elsewhere. Please reconsider your stance on life in general and stop bringing shit into already shitty place as it will not make it any better or you wont see a difference to make you feel good enough to be worth your time.