/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6912938
>Go on, dismiss extraterrestrial life using scientific methods and not some bullshit
I don't need scientific method to dismiss bullshit which has no evidence. Ghosts and leprechauns don't need to be disproved in the lab, because it's obvious they aren't real. Scientific method doesn't give a shit about unobservable garbage claims.

>I said that God is pretty much the 'beginning' I didn't define him as a person or any other bullshit. I even stated that the big bang, technically, could be god
If I define to call my feces "chocolate", do I suddenly have food? You're retarded and you're shifting the goalposts because you're grasping at straws. When talking about "god", you are talking about a concept with various cultural and historical defining connotations. You want to talk about the big bang? THen talk about the big bang. But that's not "god" and will never be "god" because "god" is a fictional omnipotent entity. You're not in a position to redefine words and then to expect others to play along with your private autism language. Adjust your fedora, moron. It must of cut off the blood supply to your brain.

>I have also clearly stated that I am a strict agnostic
And I explained why there is no such thing as "agnostic". Either you belive or you don't.