[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4628910 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4628910

What's a good telescope to buy? Looking for something in the $1000-2000 range, purely for amateur recreational purposes. I know next to nothing about brands and models and such.

>> No.2463890 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2463890

Just curious /sci/
Lets say we build the largest possible telescope array in space, perhaps at the lagrange point between the earth and moon.
What would be the best possible resolution we could get from this telescope? How far away could we make out meter sized objects on another planet or astroid? What are the limitations?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution

>> No.2152998 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2152998

/sci/entists!

You have ten minutes of time with the Hubble telescope. All data will be recorded. You may point it at anything. What do you point it at?

>> No.1947478 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1947478

I used this for the longest time, then the scientists wanted it back after they found out I was perving on their wives and daughters.

>> No.1678596 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1678596

>> No.1655604 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, Hubble.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1655604

>Feel bad for scia
>Save his thread by dumping space pictures collection

Artificial stuff 3/4

>> No.1566932 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, Hubble.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1566932

So, what kind of telescope are you?

>> No.1062275 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1062275

>>1062063

If the planet was 20,000km in diameter (and we wanted to resolve details 10,000km across) at 10 light years away, that's about 0.0000000436 arcseconds across..

To have a telescope that would directly "see" that, we'd need a telescope with an aperture (mirror or lens size) of over 2500km!

Might be a while before we can make one

>> No.1014230 [View]
File: 39 KB, 450x347, hubble-space-telescope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1014230

How close are we to directly imaging an earth sized extra-solar planet with the same resolution as we would see any other planet in our solar system? Is this possible with current technology just by making a really really big telescope (thus our only limitations would be the practicality of building something so big) , or are there other issues that would need to be addressed?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]