/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14664350
>Even a sycophant like you would acknowledge black holes, yes?
I personally don't think they exist. From my understanding, Earth's EM field helps deflect radiation- it doesn't draw light in. So I don't see why a "bLaCk HolE" would "attract" light.
>There is a perfect balance of positive and negative energymatter. They cancel to 0.
Pseudoscientific nonsense.

I'm under the impression most of (((Modern Science))) is just some room-temp psychopaths who write sci-fi fanfiction and force everyone to pretend it's real, or they'll just call you a schizo and deplatform you for arguing against their religion.

>>14660695
>Is the act of distinguishing science from pseudosciece, by itself, pseudoscience
It's probably more scientific than the pseudoscientific subject it is trying to label as such if that's what you're asking.

>Some Fields

>>14660308
>You know how light bends from gravity, right?
I've heard that claim, but I'm not sure I'm fully on board with it.
>It's why the James Webb images are distorted.
No, that would be Photoshop responsible for that.

Wow.
For whatever reason, this particular subject REALLY gets the shills triggered.

>>14648506
They make slide threads to prevent people from discussing about how most modern (((science))) is fraudulent pseudoscience.

>>14640920
We could find out the real answers.
But that would mean you would have to throw away like 90% of the current model that's been built up over the last century or 2.
And certain (((people))) aren't ready to do that apparently. They'd rather just fellate Einstein into their grave.

>>14640576
The problem is that plenty of fields in modern Academia are just pseudoscience at best, or intentionally misleading fraud at worst.

>>14639687
>We are at war with Russia So no, it's not a good idea.
Just stop talking, you literally have no idea what you're even talking about.

>>14639783
>i wouldn't be suprised if russian studies wouldn't be acknowledged in the west
90% of Western studies shouldn't even be acknowledge in the West desu.

>>14636077

>>14629902
Why have there been so many threads lately with (((scientists))) calling everyone else retarded for not believing in their fairy tales?

Why do they care what some literal-who's think?

>>14625696
>I can gather from your posts that you do not know enough about physics to really appreciate the problems of the field today
Because most of (((Physics))) today is just Philosophy.

>>14628242
>I'd rather have CERN than having any funding at all to the "social sciences"
Unless you're just being ironic, that doesn't really make sense, because CERN literally are the "Social Sciences".