/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14742047
>How?
>rapid changes in temperature
>hurr durr we gonna go extinct
In reality human population exploded and thrived even harder than previous epoch.

>How is warming 1/25 as fast as current warming much worse? How is rapid warming on top of interglacial warming better?
You've yet to explain why it's worse. All you can point out to is a hypothetical mass extinction event in which even fucking life thrived without any sort of problem whatsoever.

>We are not evolved to go outside of that range, nor will we evolve in a few hundred years
I just posted a link entirely refuting your retarded delusion and your major response is to conjure a made up retardation that we are not currently evolving at a faster rate than our ancestor does. Again, don't be turbo retarded and make claims that you literally don't have any clue.

>Not an argument. Your own graphs show slow warming, not extreme warming.
My own graph shows that we've had unprecedented warming and that's when haplogroup R was born, an ethnic group that literally prepped up numerous ancient societies and civilization that you see today. Again, putting a large gaping hole in your retarded narrative.

>In order to concede I would have had to have first denied it. Another pathetic lie.
>I would have to denied it
There you go lad. Now you understand your won concession.

>And I've already refuted your arguments countless times
>n-n-n-n-no u!
Pathetic

>has nothing to do with CO2 emissions and everything to do with power production.
The fact that you don't even think that fossil fuel power production correlates with highly with human technologies and current society shows how far you've gone down the green retard rabbit hole.

>See >>14741418 and >>14741431
lol we can do this all day anon
>>14741789
>>14741779

>>14742095
>Where?
Pic related, massive change in climate and environment and yet here we are