/sci/ - Science & Math

What do you think the percentage of birds being flightless is? Over 100% of all known species?

30%?

>>5473002
Deedee nooooooo!

If the human brain was a computer, what would its specs be?

uhh...yes?

>>3396089

What would discrete space even mean? That makes no sense bro. Everything that exists is continuous even discrete things, because of how our mind works and our imagination.

Beginnings and endings are arbitrary...

>>3234891
>>3234881
>>3234902
>>3234909
>>3234912
>>3234931
>>3234937


SAMEFAG C-C-C-C-COMBO

Dahhhh?!

Has anyone actually been cryogenically frozen yet?

My second question is, are they fullretard?

>>2831147
>>2831147


>mfw Monsanto sues farmers when it's GMO seeds are accidently spread by the wind into their farms

Pixels and lots of it..
what am i looking at

consciousness is the brain

well it's simple, first you...


>mfw

>>2418417

>to an atheist, this life is the end in itself, the whole point of their existence culminates in this life, this world, now.

>atheism is completely life-affirming, theism is life-denying

im ok with this

>>2379201

>mfw OP doesn't realize the box opened him

I need a Math workout regimen.

All I know is up to Calc I and some basic matrix algebra.

I wanna get good at math, but there are so many topics with so many varying degrees of difficulty...

I need a structured approach.

>>2309668

>yahoo answers.
>>Chemistry is harder. It requires a decent understanding of physics

It's harder than physics because it uses some physics. Using a bit of physics is harder than pure physics.


>mfw retard

>>2280773

wtf did you just say???

Hi guys can you help me with chemistry?

The following question:
"What is the pH in a 10% NaOH, when you know the density is 1.1089 g/mL?"

Is there an end to the universe? What is beyond it? What is it? What kind of physical/spatial boundaries does the universe have?

This is a more theoretical question for chemistry, but I was wondering if anyone here knows how to go about doing this?

>You pipet 10.00 mL of a 0.100 M solution of reactant A into an Erlenmeyer flask. Reactant A is then titrated with a titrating solution containing reactant B. The following reaction occurs:

>A + 3B => products

>It takes the addition of 33.24 mL of the titrating solution (I.E., the reactant B solution) to reach the endpoint. What is the molar concentration of reactant B in the titrating solution?

Since it takes 3 times as many moles of B to react with A, would I just multiply the concentration of A by 3? This seems like it should be simple but it's escaping me.

>>1807831

LOL

>well we need trade skills too, engineers and scientists are good worker ants for any society. but like you said they are down on the ladder...

fucken true.

>>1743994

>You can always satisfy your theoretical appetite much easier than you can satisfy your engineering appetite. When you actually want to DO science or CREATE something, it's a whole different problem.

engineerfag raises a good point

How do I become the best science student?

>not sure why ppl limit themselves with non-engineering degrees, when they can get the same education for free with a library card