/sci/ - Science & Math

Another example of this guy's "285 papers" bullshit, he links to the National Academy of Sciences National Research Council Report here:
http://archive.org/stream/understandingcli00unit/understandingcli00unit_djvu.txt

Direct quotes from the source again:
>we do not have a good quantitative understanding of our climate machine and what determines its course. Without the fundamental understanding, it does not seem possible to predict climate
Sure sounds like the NAS was absolutely certain Global Cooling was occurring and there was a scientific consensus from this quote, right?
>Climatic change has been a subject of intellectual interest for many years. However, there are now more compelling reasons for its study: the growing awareness that our economic and social stability is profoundly influenced by climate and that man's activities themselves may be capable of influencing the climate in possibly undesirable ways. The climates of the earth have always been changing, and they will doubtless continue to do so in the future. How large these future changes will be, and where and how rapidly they will occur, we do not know

Also notice how this NAS article from 1975 is using the term CLIMATE CHANGE. So where are all the faggots now that always claim Climate Change was the "new term" to replace Global Warming? Where the fuck are you faggots now? BTFO. Before Al Gore, before any of your conspiracy crap existed, Climate Change was being used.


I see the guy has already scurried off though, think he got BTFO a few too many times.
The only way to get these people to fuck off is to look at their sources, find the contradictions and shut them the fuck up, forcing them to run away with their tail between their legs. Absolutely pathetic.