/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8732545
And this is exactly what I mean when I say that you race deniers don't trust your senses and your intuition. Oh no, I just learned a new fact that suggests that a morally repugnant thesis might actually be true? I'll just assume there's some reason why it's wrong automatically and not question that assumption ever, phew, that was close.

Let's be honest here, you find that idea that sub-saharan african dna being bad at making civilizations morally repugnant. That's why you try so hard to fight it, even going as far as to assume there's always some comforting explanation for why any any evidence that supports it is wrong. It has already been shown theres bias in academia against morally repugnant hypotheses, why wouldn't it apply to you? To expand on this concept, you erroneously assume that anyone who disagrees with you must be coming from a position of moral inferiority, or else why would they have that position?

Well the answer is that the facts suggest it. No one can come up with any reasonable counter-argument to these two posts
>>8732515
>>8732501

It's time to come to terms with your own bias and the nature of the world you live in.