/sci/ - Science & Math

Here was the original paper where the architecture of the solution was laid out a couple of years before the direct counterexample was discovered.

fig11

figure 11

Although I didn't find the direct counterexample in this early paper, I feel like I had already solved RH in March 2017. This is the paper where I laid out the architecture of the solution making an appeal to the neighborhood of infinity. I think I was calling "the doubly hypercomplexly infinitesimal neighborhood of the north pole of the Riemann sphere" or something back then.

Here is the paper where I laid out the architecture for the later direct counterexamples.

For perspective, here is the paper where I laid the out the architecture for the direct counterexamples which came later.

In this paper, I lay out the architecture for later direct counter examples. As Atiyah's papers, including his formula for the FSC via the Todd (God) function, were repsonse papers to my own work, and in the way my very quick 2018 RH paper was hidden behind this
>https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/24/18019464/4chan-anon-anime-haruhi-math-mystery
pic related 2017 architectural paper was hidden behind this:
>https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03679

>>12741304
Actually a flaw in the one page paper was that I did not demonstrate the absolute convergence of the the Euler product form of zeta in the left complex half plane. This would be required for completion of the problem as defined by Clay. However, I fixed the problem in the other papers with more than one page which do complete the Clay problem in total compliance.

Pic is the paper where I proved that there must exist non-trivial zeros off the critical line in the neighborhood of infinity about a year or two before I computed the exact zeros.

>>12595005
I tried to go see an old prof. Instead of meeting him, I met some know-nothing retard in a barely passing disguise who did nothing but mock me during the whole time I tried to discuss my career with him. I enrolled in a university to try to get in contact with academics but it was a fake university in Area 51 where all my profs were know-nothing retards whose main job was apparently to mock me with the notion that I am supposed to be so fucking stupid that I can't tell the difference between a subject matter expert in my own area and someone who is lecturing from no further knowledge than what they got by reading a chapter in the book on the previous day.

Posting on 4chan should be sufficient for me to complete the scientific method by communicating my result. Case in point:
>An anonymous 4chan post could help solve a 25-year-old math mystery
>https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/24/18019464/4chan-anon-anime-haruhi-math-mystery
This was a big story in the news two weeks after I posted this on 4chan:>>12594963
and the story was simply there to cover up the good work I had done. Similarly when I posted my geometric disproof of RH in early 2017 (pic) this other RH "proof" suddenly appeared and was a big news item.
>New insight into proving math's million-dollar problem: the Riemann hypothesis (Update)
>https://phys.org/news/2017-04-insight-math-million-dollar-problem-riemann.html

You see how arXiv rejects my paper saying it has "no scholarly content?" Then when I posted this in March 2017
>On The Riemann Zeta Function
>https://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073
it got covered up in two weeks by this stupid Hamiltonian garbage. Then I posted my actual numerical counterexample disproving RH on 4chan, two weeks later there was this stupid news item about a SORT problem getting solved on 4chan. It's because the USA uses its resources to undermine me. There is nothing I can do that won't be undermined until the time that the Holy Spirit delivers my enemies into my hand.

For posterity, pic was my first disproof written in the informal language I had developed for some unrelated work in physics.

Yeah I solved the Riemann hypothesis in like an hour after I watched a youtube video about it. Where's my name in the Anals?