/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5956532
>emotions are just as valid as knowledge
>self-gratification is just as meaningful as exploration
>if the majority wants to do completely and utterly stratify intellectual growth, why not let them do it?

I am not speaking in terms of right and wrong. I am speaking in terms of true and false. Virtual reality may feel gratifying, but it is false. The explorers seek out that which is true and, when they return to bequeath this truth to the rest of the species, it is spurned in favor of subjective falsehoods.

Do you have any realistic science wallpapers? If so, please share them. Space and particularly non-Earth surface wallpapers are preferable.

>>3964031

>science
>not fiction

>mfw

Most of the scientific concepts are useless and pointless. It's the technology and medicine which is useful, not science. Science is a bunch of pointless equations and theories which don't contribute to the society. The government should stop funding science, but fund technology and medicine instead.

>science
>not fiction

>mfw

Most of the scientific concepts are useless and pointless. It's the technology and medicine which is useful, not science. Science is a bunch of pointless equations and theories which don't contribute to the society. The government should stop funding science, but fund technology and medicine instead.

What's foreign investment and how does it make the economies grow?

How to tell if a function is even or odd?

>>3910525

>>3843729
>mfw this picture

Where can I learn how to find the integral of some function?

Do you have any good calculus exercises websites/PDFs/etc? Could you please share them? I've checked the sticky, but there isn't much calculus exercises here.

From the scientific point of view, how is pleasure generated when you rub your dick?

I found an atom on the ground when I was waiting for my bus. What do I do with it?

>>3748372
You're right, we are the pinnacle of knowledge, everything we know or even assume now must be correct. There is nothing new to discover.

What's the point of having countries (territorial and economical divisions) which aren't based on any important differences in opinions and values? In most of the economically developed countries, the differences within the country (ex: political views, religion, traditions, values etc) are as significant or even more significant than when comparing different economically developed countries.

Why don't countries divide into differences in important opinions, living together with which differences is less beneficial than living separated?

According to what laws are the wages of the owner of a private company set?

>>3691376
>stupid free-market individualistic multicultural libertarian asshole who should be sent off to a forced labor camp