/sci/ - Science & Math

>Our sample
>Doesn't show effects others have observed
>We argue that...
>This is a ferromagnet because it just is


It's very good to be skeptical, but this is just plain shit science.
Chinks didn't manage to get a levitating rock so they claim it's just a ferromagnetic effect all across the board for all samples.
Besides it's already show on a video not to be ferromagnetic compared to a ferromagnetic spec behaving very differently compared to the sample.
I think these guys just got angry because they didn't get results, and they're trying to save face by saying everyone else produced nothing more than a regular fridge magnet.

>>15627875
>its real

>>14641936
>>14641938
>>14641939

>rockslide from nearby mountain creates megatsunami that washes the whole lake city away

To calculate the death rate you take the number of deaths divided by the sum of the number of deaths and the number of recovers. This is how you calculate the death rate you morons!

Normies seem to not grasp this, and just brush it off like
>it's just a flu bro, the death rate is well under 1%

I got in an argument with my co-workers, they kept insisting that the number of recovers is irrelevant and that death rate is defined by the number of deaths divided by total number of infected (absolutely retarded).

>>11268686
>hurr we're gonna shit up the Earth and migrate to a desert planet, that'll be the solution
>we managed to survive for millions of years fine
>but that's totally gonna stop anytime now and we're all gonna die
>we're on the edge of being unable to keep the Earth liveable
>but we're totally on the edge of being able to make an absolutely unliveable planet become liveable
This is what scififags actually believe. Your mind and imagination are polluted, this is a pathology. But if you retards want to spend trillions of your dollars to pitch a pressurised tent in between two rocks in a desert on an airless planet and never come back, be my guest.

>>10672765
The bar must have been pretty low.

>>10610150
Extreme brainlet detected.

>then go fooking out and meet people
People don't want to be bothered unsolicited advances, especially if you are showing up in a $500 beater car.
>then you start knowing people, easy peasey
You start irritating people*
>honestly; who told you it was supposed to be easy?
Imbeciles offering platitudes such as yourself.
>it might take a while but then you got a job for quite some time, then you start looking for opportyunities to learn and improve and possibly get a new job
Someone give this man a noble prize.

>If it feels good, do it

>>10529741
>mfw this whole fuckin thread
>mfw reality is subjective and shit only happens how it needs to have happened for the present to be playing

>>10478448
You are so far behind the curve, brainlet. I don't even want to correct you. Big yikes.

>>10461574
t.

If you're too ignorant to understand the global implications of large scale climatic changes, and the associated impacts on human civilization, combined with the stresses of overpopulation, deforestation, urbanization, species extinction, fisheries depletion, sea level rise, coral reef bleaching, ocean acidification, decrease in global biodiversity, increased natural disasters, etc. you are the one that is the brainlet you dumb fuck.

>>10455811
I hardly knew my advisors. I went out of my way to avoid them. I knew what I was doing. I didn't need their advice.
Truth is, you're a retard. Just collect SSDI, 88% approval chance for autism. You'll get $1500 a month at least, with some college, probably $1600 with a complete degree and over $2000 a month with a full work history. I don't want you in society, that is why I am suggesting this, free of charge.

>>10450675
>I don't understand psychopharmacology or addiction liability, the post

>>10437073
>Why would you invest in nuclear when you can invest in wind or solar?
t. some NPC tier retard who doesn't understand shit about nuclear energy.

>To produce 1,200 megawatts of energy like Wolf Creek — a nuclear power plant in Burlington — you would need 120 square miles of land devoted to wind turbines.

Why would anyone want a more consistent, completely predictable form of energy than can be built most anywhere instead of a windfarm that is complex, highly contingent on weather conditions and location?

You're a fucking retard.

It's not really a fair comparison. For one, they stood the test of time. As in, there are hundreds if not thousands of shitty scientists in the past or mystics that contributed very little to their fields. Any number of scientists today could be as influential as they are, but we won't know until we're all long dead and they are famous after death.

Secondly, science in the past worked in much larger bounds. Like today we have tiny research dedicated to tiny fields; like the individual family trees of different species as opposed to the ENTIRE CONCEPT OF EVOLUTION which is a broad stoke sort of thing. As such, your tiny contributions are less based on your intelligence or innate potential and more on the fact that science is much more regimented.

>>10397755

>>10392193
>anecdotal claims

>>10391369
>hasn't read the schematics nor watched any of the links

>>10381776
>gets linked to peer reviewed medical studies
>still talks out of his ass

>>10374543

How hard is discrete mathematics?

starting cyber security bachelor in 6 months

brainlet here
will i make it?

>>10292690
correction [math]\{(0, 0)\} \in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^2)[/math]

>>10286728
>creationism happened because the bible said so

>YOU'RE AN NPC
>NO YOU'RE AN NPC
>NO IT IS YOU WHO IS THE NPC