/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11608932
He's not really responding to the idea you're posting, he's just prattling about the standard Wikipedia method for some reason.

Whether an apeirogon is "valid" depends on what context you mean. You can't actually draw a regular apeirogon in the Euclidean plane, unless you're willing to go full retard and accept that an infinitely long straight line is a polygon. You can't draw one "around" a circle.
In other contexts it sometimes makes more sense, but not here.