/sci/ - Science & Math

>The Big Bang happened everywhere at once
What the FUCK does this mean?
How did the universe expand from a single point if it was already everywhere and what is it expanding into?
Someone explain this shit to me like I'm retarded because I sure as shit feel like I am.

>>15463166
>Behold: the intellectual products of atheism.

I like how u guys added the flash of light at the beginning just to make it clear that your theory is religion and not science

Are there any good scientific counter arguments against the "big bang theory"?

>>14801116
I was referring to pic related. I had always read that the “dark ages” lasted 400ish million years. However CERRS 93316 is formed and already well structured (again needs verification) just 200ish million years post-bang.

If Pop III stars had to have formed, nova’d and then the heavier elements/gases again accretion disk post nova for standard—-hell how far back does that go then?

RE: galaxies—as I understand it when professional astronomers state “galaxy” it has to consist of gas, dust and a minimum of a number of stars (10 million?). No stars would be a proto-galaxy, so if CEERS is confirmed at that age—we’ll that certainly does some major shifting to our timeline doesn’t it?