/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14711976
>Either you're Ken
Lot's of people on this board would really love to believe I'm him. I used to post a convenient avatar to remind them I'm not him, but then a Janny banned me for that so I can neither confirm not deny these claims. I'd also love to be a namefag, but then mundane retards would simply disregard what I say simply because I was forced to use a name for their own benefit.
How ironic that I can only use apophatic rhetoric now to imply I'm not ken because otherwise I would be persecuted.

>Your entire "response" (to even call it that is being very generous) is a tangled mass of deflection and characterization.
I'm only quoting him and what he's said.

>It will be a lot of implicit "I am" and "you are", which serves as bait to put me on the defensive, and you'll continue to act like you're responding while layering on mockery and more and more of this framing. It can be very effective and people tend to fall for it, but ultimately it's a gradeschool level simple and very tired old game. You've already begun this process by putting words in my mouth and then just responding "lol" or "rofl". This is subtle mockery.

That's quite a lot of words that ultimately say absolutely nothing about whether or not Ken is wrong. You sound insecure and reliant on preserving your pride on an anonymous imageboard that will forget about you tomorrow morning.

>This is subtle mockery.
I'm laughing at you. It's not subtle at all you idiot.

yes it is for you then.

>>8419657

>>7988829

>>7723325

>>7346199

>>7309604
0/10, you can do better than that.

Haven't seen such desperate bait for ages.

>>7068771

>>6957094