/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3147657
>observer effect

It is just wave-function collapse. Anything that causes a collapse of a particular measurable is an observer. An "observer" need not be human, it could be a rock, or anything really.

>wave-particle duality

The fundamental objects in the universe are fields (wave like properties). Certain excitations and particular happenings of a field, cause an "excitation", which we view as a particle.

Edison was a bro.

Tesla was a faggot who exaggerated most of his accomplishments (earthquake machine out of a five pound oscillator? really? fucking dumb shit)

Edison wins. Just look at that subtle little smirk. He knows he's the shit.

>>2372899
Why the switch from particle to astro?

>>2341261
The answer to you question is not known yet. You are familar with unanswered questions right?

Example: What are the winning numbers for tommarrows lottery. This is a question we dont know the answer to yet.

\thread

>>2176625

The empire Strikes Back

Luke gets trained by Yoda on Yoda's shithole of a planet. To break up the sequence, the film cuts to the Millennium Falcon getting chased by the Empire to Lando's cloud city.

When they arrive, they get captured, at which point Luke has finished his training.

Well, that doesn't work. Were they chased for months? Or was Luke trained in an afternoon? Either we were spared some extended scenes on board the Millennium Falcon featuring starvation and debates about when they'd have to eat Chewbacca, or becoming a Jedi is easier than getting a cub scout merit badge.

If light acts as a particle it must have mass, there for e = mc^2 applies, so tell me sci, how can it act as a particle when the amount of energy light has, would show that light would have a very high mass aswell.

>>1732231
We don't know if it is just the "math" that contains the superpostion, or if the physical universe actually can exist in "states of superposition", Since we never can directly observe things in "superposition".

"Why does Tesla always want to know if I am free in the evening?" - T. Edison

>>1040203

Indeed!