/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14955851
>images (which are not pictures, but interpretation of signals according to their "standard model", which is probably wrong)

boring flat earther drivel.
pic related:
left is a picture/photograph because its straight out of a camera.
right is an image because it has several photos stacked.
Which one is more true to life?
Same goes for stitched together collages or images captured in different wavelengths, doesn't have anything to do with "interpretations of signals" no matter how much you 0 iq monkeys repeat this line.


A gunner inside a helicopter gunship with an infrared camera also only sees "images", but you don't see hajis complainining over the images not being real after being turned into mist, do you?
You can seethe about NASA and other space agencies using the term image correctly, doesn't make you less of an uninformed retard