[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10983922 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10983922

>>10983911
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

>> No.9941569 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9941569

>>9941272
>>9941319
>>9941328
>>9941338
It barely does anything simply because there's not enough power or power density to lift enough weight or produce enough force to properly maneuver in the ways needed for it to be useful. This is because it is horrifically inefficient in its design. Why? Because people want a "hoverbike" design for some tarded reason.

>>9941562
>Same reasons why we do not have flying cars

We have them. They are called, "helicopters," and, "aeroplanes".

>> No.9440497 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9440497

>hoverbike
>flies all around everywhere

So a copter, not a hoverbike.

>> No.9215204 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215204

>>9214524
Is this the hoverbike poster? Because you will never make anything better than a helicopter.

>> No.9050238 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9050238

>>9050228
/sci/ is full of normie NEETs and fake /pol/ posers. There's like 5 people here interested in real science. This thread is popsci engineering stuff though.

>> No.9004132 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9004132

>>9003824
>orbital rings faggot posts it again

This is just as bad as that guy who kept posting the hovercraft shit for cities and EMTs.

>> No.8703570 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8703570

>>8703229
That isn't a copter though. It can't lift off and fly out of ground effect under its own power and can't get higher without additional reflected sunlight. Anything that can't fly out of ground effect under its own power is just a hover craft.

>> No.8038576 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x286, Worthless Hoverbike.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8038576

>>8038062
That's not a hoverbike though. Are you daft?

This is a hoverbike, which is as worthless as it looks.

>>8038050
It is a helicopter. You're right, it'd be way better to use a single rotor. It'd need to be specially designed and not a conversion of course. Regardless, current battery to weight ratios puts anything you make under the 30 minute flight time mark. It is better to use combustible fuels until batteries are far better.

A few of my neighbors have Mosquito helicopters. One of their RC models is just about the same size as those. They are constantly flying around the farms with the Mosquitos landing willy-nilly in the fields. They are so small and light that you don't need to register or have a pilot's license to fly the ultralight versions. They have 1-4 hour flight time (60-250 miles) depending on the model you get and if you get extra fuel tanks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5NTDVXiTiI

>>8038062
>market

Kek, there's a handful of people making hoverbikes (which don't work well and are inefficient as fuck) but no legitimate company is making them. Meaning there's no "market".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]