[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.5706112 [View]
File: 14 KB, 300x275, 192280-comic_book_guy_13018_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5706112

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22252099


>Making of Europe unlocked by DNA

>A study of remains from Central Europe suggests the foundations of the modern gene pool were laid down between 4,000 and 2,000 BC - in Neolithic times.

>> No.4369160 [View]
File: 14 KB, 300x275, 192280-comic_book_guy_13018_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4369160

So,

what the hell is the benefit of colonizing on the moon?

>> No.2769976 [View]
File: 14 KB, 300x275, comic_book_guy_by_jimboy_sk8s-d2y9ind.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2769976

Why is it that 50% of the time, some loser on /sci/ will pick out one flaw in a post, point it out and call the OP stupid. When really, all it took was mere elaboration by the OP to clear things up, or sometimes even a non-literal, colloquial usage of a term to get a point across that gets picked apart?

Pick related, the type of poster on /sci/ who focuses on this sort thing.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]