/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5874102
>>5874106
>confused concepts

Nothing you have posted negates Krauss (most scienists). When they speck of quantum physication that are talking about a different type.

See
>>5874116

Your post falls completely in line with Krauss (most scientists).

>>5104981
Okay, starting to get cold. Can't wait for the slopes to open!

>>5104986
Grammer isn't very important in an international setting. If you don't understand that you win second place for the dumbfuck of the day.

>>3746254
What are you bitching about?
You want more recent texts that give the deriavtion for the varible speed of light in GR?

1) The Meaning of Relativity, A. Einstein, Princeton University Press (1955).
See pages 92-93, eqn (107)

2) Relativity, Gravitation, and Cosmology', T. Cheng, Oxford University Press (2005). see pages 48-49, eqn (3.39)

I dare you to find one GR book that says "c" is the light-speed limit for non-inertial frames. (Hint: There are none)