[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15274923 [View]
File: 578 KB, 859x559, 1675080124146184.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15274923

>>15274665
>The ostensible reason is because if the placebo group doesn't feel like shit after getting the injection, they'll know it was the placebo.
Absolutely retarded argument.
HPV is a cancer...
Happening in women post 50 years of age.
They created a vaccine.
Gardasil 5...
Within a period of 8 years.
And a small 42 month trial of pre 26 year old girls.

To show efficacy of preventing cancer... that normally appears after tha age of 50...
Within a 42 months trial.

And some subsequent 12 and 7 months trials...

Then after mysteriously all of a sudden the girld who got vacced with Gardasil 5 got cancer (which they normally should not get).

Then gardasil 5 got pulled from the marked..
But they did a upgrade.
> Gardasil 9
With the same conditions.
https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,%20blood%20&%20biologics/published/Package-Insert---Gardasil.pdf

Study 001
> Dose-finding substudy extended from Day 1 through Month 7, and the duration of immunogenicity substudy was
42 months

Study 002
>Lot consistency substudy compared 3 manufacturing lots for immunogenicity of the
vaccine in 9-15 year-old girls, in a randomized and double-blinded fashion.
The duration of P002 study was 12 months (for safety).

Study 009
> The study compared 9vHPV vs. Gardasil for immunogenicity and safety in 9-15 year-old girls. This was a
double-blind randomized trial with the duration of 7 months.

> 9-15 year-old girls.
> 7 months
Efficacy for cancer prevention...

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]