/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7181324
That's because the purpose of the study that chart is from is comparing blacks and whites.

Whatever helps you feel better doe

>>7181321
>1. Because those studies are too fucking old to be relevant.

Research continues to be done. I'd like some evidence that can debunk it if you're going to claim it's "not relevant".

>2. Because the distributions are much closer now.

Apparantly at best a 5 point lesser difference.

>3. Because you will never be able to pass a judgement on an individual according to the "likelihood" of a race.

I never said anything about judging anyone. This is about racial IQ differences, which are scientific fact.

>>7181322
It's from The Bell Curve.

Pic related also from the Bell Curve showing the correlation of IQ and factors of social success among strictly whites. Notice how the same problems rampant in the black community are akin to those among low-IQ whites?